From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 12:20:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616E416A468 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CABD13C45B for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2VCKBvl012620 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:20:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l2VCKBZN012619; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:20:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:20:11 GMT Message-Id: <200703311220.l2VCKBZN012619@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org From: Nicolas Rachinsky Cc: Subject: Re: bin/104623: "rc.d/ppp restart" stops all instances of ppp X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nicolas Rachinsky List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:20:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/104623; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: Mike Makonnen Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/104623: "rc.d/ppp restart" stops all instances of ppp Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:49:00 +0200 * Mike Makonnen [2007-03-31 13:49 +0300]: > +# usage: /etc/rc.d/ppp [tunX] I haven't yet tried it, but I see one problem. AFAIK there is no mechanism to start more than one ppp with the current rc.d/ppp script via rc.conf. Thus I can't imagine how this can work if I do this with a tun device that does correspond to the ppp started via rc.d/ppp. And it will still terminate processes that are unrelated to the pp started via rc.d/ppp if it is used without the additional parameter. So I don't think, this can fix the real problem, that there is no way to identify the ppp instance that were started via rc.d/ppp. At least I see no such way. Do I miss something? Nicolas