From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 27 08:00:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA207A0AE32 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 08:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dr.klepp@gmx.at) Received: from b2bfep12.mx.upcmail.net (b2bfep12.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E60CAE for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 08:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dr.klepp@gmx.at) Received: from edge11.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.81]) by b2bfep12.mx.upcmail.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.18 201-2260-151-151-20140610) with ESMTP id <20150927075903.IHQC32668.b2bfep12-int.chello.at@edge11.upcmail.net> for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:59:03 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([85.126.97.210]) by edge11.upcmail.net with edge id N7z31r0034YLlkt0B7z3B6; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:59:03 +0200 X-SourceIP: 85.126.97.210 From: "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel atom N2600 cpu freq_levels on 10.2 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:59:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) References: <5607A0E2.5060908@luckie.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <5607A0E2.5060908@luckie.org.nz> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201509270959.04250.dr.klepp@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 08:00:43 -0000 Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 schrieb Matthew Luckie: > Hi > > I just updated to FreeBSD 10.2, and I'm noticing that the CPU frequency > levels available are much more limited compared to FreeBSD 10.1 on the > same system. For my intel atom n2600, the lowest level available is > 600Mhz, whereas with 10.1 it was 75Mhz. > > I've put my dmesg from boot at: > > http://www.caida.org/~mjl/atom-2600-dmesg.txt > > dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 3645us > dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1 > dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/20 C3/3/100 > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1600/2000 1400/1720 1200/1440 1000/1160 800/880 > 600/600 > dev.cpu.0.freq: 600 > dev.cpu.0.temperature: 34.0C > dev.cpu.0.coretemp.throttle_log: 0 > dev.cpu.0.coretemp.tjmax: 100.0C > dev.cpu.0.coretemp.resolution: 1 > dev.cpu.0.coretemp.delta: 65 > dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0 > dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 > dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU0 > dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu > dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU > > Is there anything simple I can do to obtain the lower CPU frequency levels? > > Matthew > > Hi! Please take a look here: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/cpu-consumes-more-energy-after-upgrade-from-10-1-to-10-2.52835/ Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.