From owner-svn-doc-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 22:19:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34D32A8; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24DB8FC0C; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (75-146-225-65-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.146.225.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73B8C23F75F; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:19:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:19:53 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: svn commit: r40000 - projects/pkgng/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports Message-ID: <20121212221953.GJ1314@glenbarber.us> References: <201211151440.qAFEeLYN099713@svn.freebsd.org> <20121115181349.GB1354@glenbarber.us> <201212121124.01664.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201212121124.01664.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org, Benjamin Kaduk X-BeenThere: svn-doc-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for doc projects trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:19:57 -0000 --FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:24:01AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:13:49 pm Glen Barber wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > Isn't the actual application just "pkg"? It's unclear to what extent= we=20 > > > really need to be talking about pkgng using the string "pkgng". > > >=20 > >=20 > > The name of the application is pkgng. The name of the command is pkg. >=20 > This is not a very future proof name. Do we get pkgngng next, or will it= be=20 > pkgds9? I think pkgng is fine for a WIP name, but once it moves to produ= ction=20 > status it should really just be called 'pkg'. >=20 In my view, the differentation made here can be equated to OpenOffice. For example, the name of the application (as a whole) is OpenOffice, but the name of the program for writing a document file is Writer. We also have things like "syslogng", that has been around forever. Glen --FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQyQMJAAoJEFJPDDeguUajYaUIAJmXjbqjx2yaSe6TUOo6T1pH H1YhRKdEQHkHMMNMg7kBCq/8bzwcMlEnNsCGdOIejLkdeP/sGC9P0TpDnVD5NN9G bu7nXj6yMbWZqOFW+T7wEz4B/h5NBwc0D1oAotWoKaLHcRzLM0K/0hSg6T5PSphm 0BPzhP+C/L9ucWUJKv+uQLb1iMr3gUebXc3wbnrxBmZ3I8BzXo7VAnAlQSTqGOVW 89rjRDzoptdB82eQE3saA+lqGu+logS15fd7LAkstJBMTuZsEcexnrWe3su8qfsW aiFjpE8lub4H/arRKFu+qZOJak+S4h/DnFlrXWTWcI7xTNK0043h7M3bk4gkUVY= =dIHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FnOKg9Ah4tDwTfQS--