From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Sep 11 12:01:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA22337
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA22327
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA15022; Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
cc: jhay@angel.cids.org.za, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Does IPX routing work? ... Of course. :-) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Sep 1996 11:30:56 PDT."
             <199609111830.LAA22171@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> 
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 12:00:14 -0700
Message-ID: <15020.842468414@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> On second reading of this I have another comment.  The reason that
> the Ethernet_II entry shows a LAN address (didn't you really mean
> an IP address?) is that TCP/IP can only be encapsulated as an
> Ethernet_II packet.

Ah, that makes sense (and yes, I meant IP - it lists it as "LAN address"
in the config screen).

					Jordan