From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jun 2 20:48:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA13408 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 20:48:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA13388; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 20:48:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA23512; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 13:48:21 +1000 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 13:48:21 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199806030348.NAA23512@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, grog@lemis.com, phk@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6794 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>> The WARNING line is printed by the kernel. A normal mount(8) would try >>> 31 slices here and the kernel would print 31 identical WARNING lines. >> >>Why that? It knows the slice it's trying to mount: it's /dev/sd0s1e, >>which fsck has just cleaned. Under what circumstances would mount(8) >>try to mount every possible slice on the disk? > >Whenever the mount point is "/", mount(8) is an unhacked -current or >-stable mount(8), and there are no mountable slices (with the given unit >and partition) on the disk. Oops. It only tries multiple slices if the device name is for a partition on the compatibility slice. This means that the problem is probably entirely in fsck. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message