From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 17 00:46:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E414A6A7D0 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C688A1B37 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from sas1.nber.org (sas1.nber.org [198.71.6.89]) by mail2.nber.org (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u0H0g4fG037015 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:42:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:42:03 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Feenberg To: jd1008 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Phishing]Re: Fortran compiler In-Reply-To: <569AD1F6.7010008@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <5426FC3A-A8F7-4B24-9CAA-1A18C176A4F1@yahoo.com> <569AD1F6.7010008@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, 2016/01/15 17:25:43 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2016/01/16 20:45:00 #6772576 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:46:52 -0000 On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 01/16/2016 04:22 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 4:15 PM, john.haraden--- via freebsd-questions < >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> > When will the base system ship with a fortran compiler? >> >> Almost certainly never. >> >> >> > Why not resurrect the old f77? >> > >> Why don't you do it and not burden base with your niche desires? >> > What a nasty NASTY response to a very very valid request. > There is a valid point in not deleting a capability merely because it has become less popular - viz ed, sed, awk etc. People appreciate the reduction in risk. daniel feenberg