From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 07:24:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E9337B401 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 07:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.acd.net (smtp.acd.net [207.179.102.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F99343FBF for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 07:24:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from taxman@ACD.NET) Received: from 207.179.65.199 ([207.179.65.199]) by smtp.acd.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:24:50 -0400 From: taxman To: Kris Kennaway Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:23:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200304172241.08776.taxman@acd.net> <20030418094151.GC96135@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030418094151.GC96135@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304181023.33018.taxman@acd.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2003 14:24:52.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[46D66BB0:01C305B6] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetch starts over X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:24:06 -0000 On Friday 18 April 2003 05:41 am, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:41:08PM -0400, taxman wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm sure this is known, but it seems fixable. When trying to fetch a > > distfile, if it fails, then fetch overwrites it and starts from the > > begining. > > Heh..nice timing. cvsup your ports collection; I committed a patch > yesterday that changes fetch to retry fetches if the checksum does not > match. Thanks Kris! I haven't had a fetch fail since cvsup to test it yet but thanks a lot. I assume (without understanding the makefile :) that it tests to see if a partial file is there and will continue on if it is, instead of starting from the beginning? Tim