From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 22 14:36:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF082C4 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3567C2847 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id qd12so2210414ieb.17 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:36:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ExcJIENT3SBeWV6IZi8gESC993xfSEbJ/tWEKewj8W8=; b=xZwTeXyXPZuuPEcYXP3AyHwBws3WpHk9AmyxvCjJyF5os39FtRxHEzSZ4Pqz0jsNJf AGl+ZffxhRghuY80UrZWBM9CeCxpVf+tWVZ1ugutGNLS+t6gJ5RbdCYXhvRzxcDtwKFA 4zf8ha/UIkdwiReiwHTIu2TAWGhjb/p1+275E8ngHEt90N1WKzxTdKpneVqabKv+vHEW eQ5GstIs1jJycyrr+mkligfpmPTJ7QTAm65BYx1wlhoZoCoNQUCUDaEdVf4EUSwS2svk +Hu1KM0Cgdnut2fXCOOmTtUuf2P9Kob0MfBq2i/GiIodlmrQ2MT4MYOTr0S5VsOuN5ig AnBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.238.196 with SMTP id vm4mr2617364igc.43.1385130960628; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:36:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.225.70 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:36:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:36:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: O_XATTR support in FreeBSD? From: Cedric Blancher To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:36:01 -0000 Are there plans to support O_XATTR in FreeBSD anytime soon? Our applications depend heavily on it (both through NFSv4 and ZFS) and we may need an alternative to Solaris soon. Ced -- Cedric Blancher Institute Pasteur