From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  5 04:26:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C3C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  5 Mar 2004 04:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.131])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C7543D48
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  5 Mar 2004 04:26:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 15898 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 12:26:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 12:26:00 -0000
Received: from it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (localhost.buh.cameradicommercio.ro
	[127.0.0.1])	by it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro (Postfix) with SMTP
	id A91FC1C8; Fri,  5 Mar 2004 14:28:00 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:28:00 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com
Message-Id: <20040305142800.5291dee8@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEPGFNAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
References: <20040303172340.GC34093@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
	<MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEPGFNAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:26:39 -0000

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:35:55 -0500
"fbsd_user" <fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> wrote:

> Please expand on your comment about 4.10 being the next stable
> release. I take this to mean that 5.2.1 is an long way off from
> moving to the stable branch.  Are you in the inter-circle that
> authorizes the movement of development branch versions to stable
> branch? Just what is the time line for 4.x stable versions and the
> 5.x development versions? Sure would like an idea of the future so I
> can plan the upgrade time line for my environment.


> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav)
> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
> Cc: security@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Security Officer-supported branches update
> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:12:07 +0100
> Message-ID: <xzpfzcnk0oo.fsf@dwp.des.no>
>=20
>  Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> writes:
>  >    +------------------------------------------+
>  >    |  Branch  |   Release   |  Estimated EoL  |
>  >    |----------+-------------+-----------------|
>  >    |RELENG_4  |n/a          |October 31, 2004 |
>  >    +------------------------------------------+
>=20
>  The actual EoL for RELENG_4 will be much later than that: at least one
>  year, possibly a year and a half, after the release of 4.10, which is
>  due this spring / early summer.
>=20
>  DES
>  --=20
>  Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no


--=20
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user