From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Aug 22 04:00:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA01928
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 04:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA01922
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 04:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id EAA06524; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 04:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 04:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708221100.EAA06524@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <97Aug21.171248pdt.177486@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> (message from Bill Fenner on Thu, 21 Aug 1997 17:12:35 PDT)
Subject: Re: Versioning bsd.port.mk
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Actually, looking at yours and itojun's patch, I was wondering...can
we use the date in the $Id$ field in the port's Makefile?  We should
make it just a warning (because there just may be no newer
bsd.port.mk) but this is zero additional burden for the port
committers and probably enough information for clueless users to get
the latest bsd.port.mk if something goes wrong.

Satoshi