From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 1 11:22:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA07639 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA07627 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA02102; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 11:21:18 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199610011821.LAA02102@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: PS broke again -- what has to be rebuilt to stop this? To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 11:21:18 -0700 (MST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199609302032.WAA03754@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 30, 96 10:32:33 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > According to Terry Lambert: > > > everything is in /proc), and therefore a ps from kernel 0.99.x, in spirit > > > at least, will work on the latest 2.0.x kernel. > > That's only in spirit though. I've seen enough people to whom was given the > advice of upgrading to the latest "ps" (even proc-ps as opposed as > kmem-ps)... That wasn't me. My posting had to do with abstracting the interface. For the advice you suggest to be effective, the abstraction has to have been flubbed... ie: they don't have the abstraction that my posting was talking about. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.