From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 27 00:08:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA11F96 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gmx@ross.cx) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F78B28 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [178.3.55.96] (helo=michael-think) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1UKdRR-00021v-4P; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:38:09 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Daniel O'Callaghan" Subject: Re: Client Authentication References: <20130326171812.GA20118@shellx.eskimo.com> <51521995.5080203@clari.net.au> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:37:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <51521995.5080203@clari.net.au> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.14 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.6/16908/Tue Mar 26 21:21:59 2013) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:08:24 -0000 On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:56:37 +0100, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > On 27/03/2013 4:18 AM, Joseph Olatt wrote: >>> Any ideas/suggestions on this will be appreciated. Thanks, >>> > >>> >-- Doug >> A little while back I wrote a system to do a simple Two Factor >> Authentication and dynamic manipulation of PF (Packet Filter) Tables. I >> created it to prevent brute-force attacks on the servers that I have >> exposed on the Internet. > I'm happy to share a program I wrote which slows down the brute force > attackers. > It simply counts the SYN packets from a given IP and limits the rate per > minute by dropping the packet if they are coming too fast. > > Uses ipfw divert sockets, so would work if you prefer ipfw over pf. Me Me Me! ...ahem. I do prefer IPFW over PF and would very much like to try it out, so please do share. Regards, Michael