From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 15 08:07:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA07296 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 08:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from DATAPLEX.NET (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA07286 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 1996 08:07:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from 199.183.109.242 by DATAPLEX.NET with SMTP (MailShare 1.0fc5); Fri, 15 Mar 1996 10:07:50 -0600 Message-ID: Date: 15 Mar 1996 10:07:24 -0600 From: "Richard Wackerbarth" Subject: Re(2): Commit messages To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "Peter Wemm" X-Mailer: Mail*Link PT/Internet 1.6.0 Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Note that I personally dislike the idea, but I'm happy to go along with > what people want. IMHO, if we do this, then we're going to have problems > with people that are running -stable not knowing what's in the pipeline in > -current, and we'll start to see wheels being reinvented... I disagree with your concern. Just a "gut" feel, but I don't think that many of the "stable" users are really generating any changes. I suspect that they are, at most, simply beta testing someone elses changes. A filtered list would greatly help them to track the changes.