From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 09:58:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036C016A50B for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:58:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (duey.wolves.k12.mo.us [207.160.214.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CCB43D31 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:58:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92511FE7F; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:58:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.wolves.k12.mo.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (duey.wolves.k12.mo.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 41384-01-35; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:58:51 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D90511FE7C; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:58:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wolves.k12.mo.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78141A91A; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:58:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:58:51 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Dillon To: Aloha Guy In-Reply-To: <20040227063625.54127.qmail@web41312.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040227115628.W32442@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us> References: <20040227063625.54127.qmail@web41312.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at wolves.k12.mo.us cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD box as router adding latency X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:58:54 -0000 On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote: > Already tried that and it did improve things a little. I tried > setting the HZ to 1000 and it didn't make much of a difference. Is > there a larger number that actually works well? You can try higher HZ numbers, but you might run into other problems. Experiment and see. Others have experimented with higher HZ numbers so you might want to check the list archives. Anyway, is a 1ms delay really that bad? -- Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet - Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures - PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development - http://www.freebsd.org Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?