From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 11 17:38:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98A37B405; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:38:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g1C1cU4v013704; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:38:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:38:30 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen To: Kip Macy Cc: "David O'Brien" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: to users of threads (GDB support) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Kip Macy wrote: > Loren Rittle indicated that they were, but pointed out what you have already > pointed out to me: freebsd-uthread.c is the work of others so my FSF paperwork > won't be enough. There's no reason freebsd-uthread.c has to be included in gdb. We've been maintaining it in our own tree for some time now. There's advantages to maintaining it in our own tree anyways. Our threads library is still under development, not to mention threadsNG where a lot is probably going to change. That said, I think dfr and I are the only ones that have done anything with freebsd-uthread.c, aside from obrien. My papers are on file with FSF. I don't know about dfr. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message