From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 2 21:40:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC96A16A403 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B58EE43D66 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:40:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mp@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 13239 invoked by uid 0); 2 Oct 2006 21:40:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.251.18.254?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 21:40:24 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 63.251.108.100 Message-ID: <452186F1.4030008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:38:57 -0700 From: Mark Peek User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Simon L. Nielsen" References: <200609302024.k8UKOjon073315@freefall.freebsd.org> <45203CEA.90301@FreeBSD.org> <20061002191258.GC1034@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20061002191258.GC1034@zaphod.nitro.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:21:19 +0000 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:22.openssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:40:30 -0000 On 10/2/06 12:12 PM, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2006.10.01 15:10:50 -0700, Mark Peek wrote: >>> Topic: Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSH >> BTW, the patches for this advisory appear to also need a patch to add log.c >> into src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile. > > Eh, why? log.c is built by libssh. Mea culpa! You are right, it was a problem with the way I was rebuilding it. Sorry for the noise on the list, I was erring on pinging you first since I thought it was a real issue. Mark