From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 22 07:00:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B9116A51D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A74543D2F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dave@horsfall.org)
Received: from localhost (dave@localhost)
	by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i3ME0XZ09527
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:33 +1000 (EST)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:32 +1000 (EST)
From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>
To: FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404222356280.8659@dave.horsfall.org>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
 <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:00:48 -0000

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Mike Maltese wrote:

> > Is this release considered stable?  It isn't even mentioned on the
> > FreeBSD page.  Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X
> > instead?
>
> Yes, 4.10-BETA == 4-STABLE.

Thanks; I was worried for a while :-)

-- Dave