Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:32 +1000 (EST)
From:      Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>
To:        FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404222356280.8659@dave.horsfall.org>
In-Reply-To: <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>
References:  <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org> <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Mike Maltese wrote:

> > Is this release considered stable?  It isn't even mentioned on the
> > FreeBSD page.  Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X
> > instead?
>
> Yes, 4.10-BETA == 4-STABLE.

Thanks; I was worried for a while :-)

-- Dave



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.58.0404222356280.8659>