Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:00:32 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> To: FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404222356280.8659@dave.horsfall.org> In-Reply-To: <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> References: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org> <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Mike Maltese wrote: > > Is this release considered stable? It isn't even mentioned on the > > FreeBSD page. Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X > > instead? > > Yes, 4.10-BETA == 4-STABLE. Thanks; I was worried for a while :-) -- Dave
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.58.0404222356280.8659>