Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:25:21 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org> Cc: perl <perl@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Maintainance of lang/perl5 Message-ID: <CADLo839im_XuJ4t%2BaecYTO6-5vi2tu_QcNWQsqjqix=4tGdKmA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAD5bB%2Bj0xb0tsfqg%2BJOdtAc_WobQkOuzzANybNcTc1R8FrfB=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130422124549.GH38955@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAD5bB%2Bj0xb0tsfqg%2BJOdtAc_WobQkOuzzANybNcTc1R8FrfB=w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Apr 2013 14:18, "Andrej Zverev" <az@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Hello. > > I think that's right for perl@ to hold lang/perl*, but you just need to > follow two simple rules to not shoot yourself heel. > > 1. Upgrade should pass test build (via exp-run). > 2. Ask at least two members of perl@ to check patch (review). > > These will allow to share responsibility :-) > > > Update, about which bapt@ was a talking above. I'm planing to migrate from > x.y.z versions to x.y. This will allow to move away from perl-after-uprade. > Also I'm thinking about better intergration of perl and pkgng in future. > > So if you want to help or discuss please join us at #bsdperl@irc.perl.org This is a great relief, and a sensible policy. Thanks Bapt and Andrej. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo839im_XuJ4t%2BaecYTO6-5vi2tu_QcNWQsqjqix=4tGdKmA>