Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 21:04:33 -0600 (CST) From: Licia <licia@o-o.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Let's nail some things down. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981028210020.13136B-100000@o-o> In-Reply-To: <3637B0EC.3A482360@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Oct 1998, Wes Peters wrote: > "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > > > > We will have two logos. "Works with" and "Designed for". Do we agree? > > > > The test for "Works with" should be a simple "can it run under some sort > > of emulation?" (E.G acroread) > > Right. Several others, including Greg Lehey, have mentioned adding the > additional qualification of "a port kit that will install this software > EXISTS." I'm coming around to this; it provides us with a good, finite > test of whether a software product really qualifies for the logo. > > Agreement? Shouts of dislike? > I think this could be a very useful test. Not necessarily if the people behind the software provide a port, but if one can be made at all. Building and testing the port itself would be a simple and effective way to verify the claim and decide which label would be awarded. > Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? > > Wes Peters +1.801.915.2061 > Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com > [ licia@o-o.org ] [ http://www.o-o.org/ ] [ IrcNick : Licia ] [ A happy user of FreeBSD : http://www.freebsd.org/ ] [ Why crawl through windows when you can walk through a door? ] [ This user boycotts all Microsoft products and services ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981028210020.13136B-100000>