From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Jan 9 14:00:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA24067 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from lserver.infoworld.com (lserver.infoworld.com [192.216.48.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA24062 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:00:51 -0800 (PST) From: BRETT_GLASS@infoworld.com Received: from ccgate.infoworld.com (ccgate.infoworld.com [192.216.49.101]) by lserver.infoworld.com (8.8.4/8.8.4/GNAC-GW-2.1) with SMTP id OAA19771; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:02:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ccMail by ccgate.infoworld.com (SMTPLINK V2.11) id AA852846957; Thu, 09 Jan 97 14:53:22 PST Date: Thu, 09 Jan 97 14:53:22 PST Message-Id: <9700098528.AA852846957@ccgate.infoworld.com> To: Simon Reading , gfoster@gfoster.com, grog@lemis.de Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Recommend 8mm exabyte drives? Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I'm considering 8mm exabyte as a (?more reliable) alternative to 4mm DAT. > Would you recommend these drives? > Regards > Simon I sure would. They're slow at random access, and at loading and unloading tapes, but streaming data transfer rates are high and they're tough as nails. Spares are widely available, as are cleaning tapes and calibration tools (which are similar to those for 8mm camcorders). You can even use camcorder tapes in a pinch. (Your error rates will be higher, but since the drive does a read-after-write it will catch errors on the fly and write the data again during the same pass.) I use a Tallgrass drive (which might as well be an Exabyte). It was OEMed by Exabyte, which subsequently bought out Tallgrass. Each tape holds 5 GB uncompressed and an average of 8 GB when you use the built-in STAC compression chip. (GZIP compression seems to do better than LZS, though it makes recovering from a dump tape more complicated.) The newer 8mm drives can put even more on a tape and can read tapes made by older ones. Probably the best thing about these drives is that, since they've been around for years, every OS and tape backup program known to Mankind has a driver for them. The model I own has one minor flaw: while it's executing certain SCSI commands (such as "rewind") it just doesn't respond to additional ones. Some tape software for DOS and Windows is confused by this behavior. But most programs and drivers are aware of this limitation. --Brett