From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Mar 10  2:30:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC10A37B99A
	for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:30:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA05604;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2000 03:02:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 03:02:15 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>,
	W Gerald Hicks <jhix@mindspring.com>, giffunip@asme.org,
	chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BSD Merger Announcement
Message-ID: <20000310030214.I14279@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003100422060.690-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000310113704.13688M-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000310113704.13688M-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>; from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:13:32PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

* Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> [000310 02:47] wrote:
> 
> What would be the opint of unifying UVM and FreeBSD VM, for example?

Actually, it could be a good thing, supposedly UVM offers a much
nicer programming model which makes it much more flexible and
FreeBSD's vm acutally has realized a unified vm/buffercache.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message