From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 15:46:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D18A37B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CD843F93 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:46:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr) Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (heho.snv.jussieu.fr [134.157.184.22]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id h6TMkeMo074771 ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:46:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h6TMke0h030865 ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:46:40 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from arno@localhost) by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TMkeSc030862; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:46:40 +0200 (MEST) To: Scott Mitchell References: <20030723104631.GA11861@llama.fishballoon.org> From: arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr Date: 30 Jul 2003 00:46:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030723104631.GA11861@llama.fishballoon.org> Message-ID: Lines: 50 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs pserver sig11 on 4.8-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:46:46 -0000 Scott Mitchell writes: > Hi all, > > We recently moved our CVS repository from a 4.6-STABLE machine to a brand > new 4.8 install, on another identical machine. The server runs cvs in > 'pserver' mode, for remote access by various Windows/Solaris/Linux/FreeBSD > clients. > > We pretty soon noticed that the cvs server process was occasionally crashing > on sig11 (ie. a segfault). The only evidence for this was in the message ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > log, the cvs operations always completed normally on the client side. ehmm, I reported that I saw this as well on my cvs-server. This evening my eye caught the log-file of one of the client boxes : Tue Jul 29 10:13:37 MEST 2003 Jul 29 11:04:43 sos login: ROOT LOGIN (toor) ON ttyv0 pid 745 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 11:26:52 sos /kernel: pid 745 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 1592 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 11:41:54 sos /kernel: pid 1592 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 3238 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 11:59:09 sos /kernel: pid 3238 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 5320 (java), uid 122: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 29 12:21:29 sos /kernel: pid 5320 (java), uid 122: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) pid 8125 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) Jul 29 12:37:35 sos /kernel: pid 8125 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 10 (core dumped) pid 16042 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 13:00:46 sos /kernel: pid 16042 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 22650 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 17:20:27 sos /kernel: pid 22650 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 26072 (java), uid 122: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Jul 29 19:54:17 sos /kernel: pid 26072 (java), uid 122: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) pid 28073 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 20:02:08 sos /kernel: pid 28073 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) pid 31158 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Jul 29 20:52:01 sos /kernel: pid 31158 (jikes), uid 122: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) I am troubled by the "The only evidence for" : the developer on this client box, as well as you (and me) for the cvs-pserver, swears everything is OK for him (from "application point of view"). Could this be a "problem@exit" or something like that? Just my thoughts. Regards, Arno