Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:26:55 -0800 (PST) From: Joseph Scott <joseph@randomnetworks.com> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/libreadline bind.c display.c mbutil.c readline.c vi_mode.c Message-ID: <20040210141900.D3194@randomservers> In-Reply-To: <20040210221812.GA24816@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200402102017.i1AKHwI9048359@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040210140914.A3194@randomservers> <20040210221812.GA24816@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Andrey Chernov wrote: -> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:10:39PM -0800, Joseph Scott wrote: -> > Is PR misc/28455 still an issue? Does having devel/readline -> > (which is version 4.3) effectively take care of needing a newer version of -> > readline for non -current systems? -> -> See discussion in the PR misc/28455 text. I did. The port devel/readline was just added at the end of last year (28 Dec 2003). The last feedback to the PR was 1.5 years before the port was added. It looked like the goal of the PR was meet (recent version of readline is availbale to 4.x system), but by the addition of a new port, not by importing into 4.x. Since the goal of the PR was met should it not be closed? If I'm completely wrong on my understanding of this that's fine, I'll be happy to change my mind :-) -- Joseph Scott http://www.randomnetworks.com/joseph/blog/contact.php
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040210141900.D3194>