Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:13:51 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 support.S
Message-ID:  <200608150913.52419.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200608151245.k7FCjpJo077372@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200608151245.k7FCjpJo077372@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 08:45, David Xu wrote:
> davidxu     2006-08-15 12:45:51 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/amd64/amd64      support.S 
>   Log:
>   Because fuword on AMD64 returns 64bit long integer -1 on fault, clear
>   entire %rax to zero instead of only clearing %eax, otherwise it will
>   leave garbage data in upper 32 bits.

Are you sure that 'xorl %eax,%eax' doesn't actually clear all 64 bits?  This
practice of just using xorl rather than xorq is all over the place in the
amd64 code, and I think I've even seen gcc generate it, so I'm guessing that
the xorl actually is a xorq.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200608150913.52419.jhb>