Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:04:52 +0100 From: Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> To: hawei@free.fr, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? Message-ID: <20090809220452.GA56972@osiris.mauzo.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Harald Weis <hawei@free.fr>: > > There is a huge problem though: > I've got now two vulnerable ports, firefox3 and linux-pango. > The linux-pango case is apparently several months old. > Any idea why the linux world doesn't seem to bother? > > How to persuade my user now not to use firefox, but w3m? > Impossible. I was about to say 'I believe the vuxml entry for firefox is incorrect', but I see it's been fixed. Neither 3.0.13 nor 3.5.2 are vulnerable, and vuxml now correctly reports this. Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090809220452.GA56972>