From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jul 5 18:53:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from dalek.xmach.org (xMach.org [209.42.222.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F23D37B407 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:53:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmallett@xMach.org) Received: (qmail 26177 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Jul 2001 01:53:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2001 01:53:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:53:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Joseph Mallett To: Brett Glass Cc: , Subject: Re: "Opposing" the "competition" (was: FreeBSD spokesman (was: So what happens to FreeBSD now?)) In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010705194903.045d4910@localhost> Message-ID: <20010705215204.R26172-100000@Dalek.xMach.ORG> Organization: xMach Core Team [ http://www.xMach.org/ ] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > You're correct. What's unclear, though, is which of the two contradictory > statements is legally binding. Different judges might rule differently > on this. > > --Brett > If I were the Judge, I'd ask why they used the "short version of the GPL". That's why I release all of my work under the MS EULA. 'Microsoft xMach: Now with built in media player' -- Joseph Mallett, jmallett@xMach.org xMach Core Team, http://xMach.org/ http://people.xMach.org/~jmallett/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message