From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 13:11:24 2008 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660A6106566B; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (mr0.ht-systems.ru [78.110.50.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4C08FC1B; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from [83.166.229.34] (helo=sputnik.SpringDaemons.com) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <stas@ht-systems.ru>) id 1KQMJo-0001R2-MC; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:11:16 +0400 Received: by sputnik.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 7F48F942101; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:14:30 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:14:25 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20080805171425.3f98dde4.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080805130409.GF97161@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <1212758604.1904.33.camel@localhost> <20080615230250.7f3efae4.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1213557999.1816.15.camel@localhost> <20080616204433.48ad9879.stas@FreeBSD.org> <e1309ba60806161110x5f774fcdic2f5c7b2e7bcb83e@mail.gmail.com> <20080616222740.5cdd9490.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1213641761.2184.0.camel@localhost> <20080805140324.9f53ba9b.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20080805115315.GE97161@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080805161520.90001117.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20080805130409.GF97161@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprin: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__5_Aug_2008_17_14_25_+0400_K0Ft8oct+VInVV_P" Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Coleman Kane <cokane@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cpuctl(formely devcpu) patch test request X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:11:24 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__5_Aug_2008_17_14_25_+0400_K0Ft8oct+VInVV_P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:04:09 +0300 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> mentioned: > I noted cpucontrol(8) only after trying to import the rev5 patch. > I do not suggest changing it, but what are the reasons for the microcode > patch headers definitions to be private for the cpucontrol, instead of > being put into the machine/<somefile>.h ? >=20 I don't think it'll be generally useful. It's just a format that vendors use to distribute firmware. Furthermore, it's only documented by intel. If something else will requres it, we can always move these definitions to appropriate header files. --=20 Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE --Signature=_Tue__5_Aug_2008_17_14_25_+0400_K0Ft8oct+VInVV_P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkiYUjYACgkQK/VZk+smlYEoRwCfcUMd45btouF92iNlkGar859+ 3B0Anir2ybUqekt6sIPDvhfv5GCsiy+L =LUn4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__5_Aug_2008_17_14_25_+0400_K0Ft8oct+VInVV_P--