Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Mar 1997 09:33:10 +0100
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        jin@george.lbl.gov (Jin Guojun[ITG])
Cc:        bugs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /etc/hosts no longer used for rexec() ?
Message-ID:  <19970326093310.VV53458@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199703260625.WAA15646@george.lbl.gov>; from Jin Guojun[ITG] on Mar 25, 1997 22:25:47 -0800
References:  <199703260625.WAA15646@george.lbl.gov>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jin Guojun[ITG] wrote:

> I have tried the local caching name server (last line) sometimes ago,
> but it does not help. We, do have some machines set up like this:
> 
>          domain my.domain
>          nameserver 127.0.0.1
> 
> with a modified named(8) under solaris system.

A caching-only nameserver is insufficient, you still need to increase
the priority of /etc/hosts over DNS.  What is sufficient however (at
least if you occasionally connect to the net), and what i'm running
for example is a caching nameserver that's also a secondary for its
own zones.  Don't forget the reverse mapping however.

I prefer this solution much over trusting any /etc/hosts file.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970326093310.VV53458>