From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jan 6 01:40:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA23337 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 01:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from freenet.hamilton.on.ca (0@main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA23329 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 01:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.66]) by freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA26257; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 04:40:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA29918; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 04:42:37 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 04:42:37 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: "Sean Batson (Sunbeach)" cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Year 2000 time change(Format support) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Sean Batson (Sunbeach) wrote: > Is FreeBSD ready for the year 2000 time change and > what are the effects if the support for this format > isn't implemented asap with the OS? I don't understand all this hub-bub about year 2000. Everyone knows Doomsday is set for Dec. 23, 1999, anyways. However, should we somehow make it past 1999, let the damn Cobol programs rot!! -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk