From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 18 8:35:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.pedcom.com (ns1.pedcom.com [207.212.209.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A664B37BA36 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:34:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asickels@netsworkinc.com) Received: from CORPBDC1 by ns1.pedcom.com via smtpd (for hub.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18]) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2000 16:34:43 UT Received: by corpbdc1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <19S85CYG>; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:30:56 -0800 Message-ID: From: Alan Sickels To: "'Daniel C. Sobral'" , Brad Knowles Cc: Clifton Royston , Tom , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & softupdates... Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:34:34 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BF7A2D.879409EA" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF7A2D.879409EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Actually RAID 0 is disk striping with *NO* redundancy. RAID *1* is mirroring. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:dcs@newsguy.com] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 6:31 PM To: Brad Knowles Cc: Clifton Royston; Tom; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & softupdates... Brad Knowles wrote: > > Of course, he's doing RAID-0 across the board for speed on his > filesystems for news articles, and no thought given to reliability > because he's got multiple servers for that kind of redundancy. He is doing RAID-0+1, I think. BTW, RAID-0 is mirroring, which has high reliability. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "If you consider our help impolite, you should see the manager." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF7A2D.879409EA Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & = softupdates...

Actually RAID 0 is disk striping with *NO* = redundancy. RAID *1* is mirroring.

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:dcs@newsguy.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 6:31 PM
To: Brad Knowles
Cc: Clifton Royston; Tom; = freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Initial performance testing w/ postmark = & softupdates...


Brad Knowles wrote:
>
>         = Of course, he's doing RAID-0 across the board for speed on his
> filesystems for news articles, and no thought = given to reliability
> because he's got multiple servers for that kind = of redundancy.

He is doing RAID-0+1, I think. BTW, RAID-0 is = mirroring, which has high
reliability.

--
Daniel C. = Sobral        =         =         (8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

        "If = you consider our help impolite, you should see the = manager."




To Unsubscribe: send mail to = majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the = body of the message

------_=_NextPart_001_01BF7A2D.879409EA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message