From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 11 21:31:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA08684 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 21:31:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA08665 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 21:31:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA16811; Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:30:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:30:17 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Ted Spradley cc: Wes Peters , Michael Knoll , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X11 and /tmp In-Reply-To: <199711120506.XAA03728@set.spradley.dyn.ml.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Ted Spradley wrote: > In the FAQ it says: "Starting xdm via /etc/ttys is a Bad Thing. I don't know > why this crept into some README file." No explanation at all of *why* it's a > Bad Thing. I *hate* that. In defiance, I've been starting xdm by listing it > in my /etc/ttys file for years with no noticeable ill effect. Can anyone tell > me *why* it's a Bad Thing? If you forget the -nodaemon option, it can cause mild discomfort as init tries to start numerous copies. Other than that, it has worked fine for me for years as well. -john