Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:15:29 -0400 From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> To: Odhiambo Washington <wash@wananchi.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: port rebuild question Message-ID: <54c46109bdfe0c4a094b12303a7268ce@chrononomicon.com> In-Reply-To: <20050630134635.GM7287@ns2.wananchi.com> References: <7a5eb7b4b0a5274f6c82e716809d4bed@chrononomicon.com> <20050630134635.GM7287@ns2.wananchi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > * Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> [20050630 15:58]: wrote: >> Silly question... >> >> If I want to rebuild amavisd-new and ALL p5 ports that amavis uses (so >> I can make sure they are seeing the upgraded PERL version properly), >> would I just use "portupgrade -rR amavisd-new"? > > I'd do portupgrade -f amavisd-new Isn't this just a force upgrade? Amavisd-new thinks it's the latest version, at amavisd-new-2.3.1,1. Or would this do the rebuild? Wait...duh...manpage says it will *also* do a rebuild. Second question; should this be done just to amavisd-new or also to PERL? And is there a way to get all the subsequent modules to rebuild that depend on PERL afterwards again, all the p5*? I'm CCing this also to the list to try to get some further responses; I'm beginning to wonder if I've somehow become persona non-grata on it. You're the only one who's tried suggesting something to help me out so far! :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54c46109bdfe0c4a094b12303a7268ce>