From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 19:22:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC19D36CCF6 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5r4n2H6lz3gLG; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C68EE95; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:22:30 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Andrew Turner Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arm64 panic: reaper-related? Message-ID: <20200714192230.GX61041@FreeBSD.org> References: <20200713135821.GS61041@FreeBSD.org> <20200713140538.GA46078@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mu1Tvth33Vj8K2q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:22:34 -0000 --5mu1Tvth33Vj8K2q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:12:41PM +0100, Andrew Turner wrote: > How reproducible is this? The backtrace and panic messages don=E2=80=99t > line up, but that may be related __stack_chk_fail being in the > trace. This is called when a stack overflow is detected. >=20 I do not yet know how reproducible it is, as this is the first time I have observed this particular panic. > I added more diagnostics to the kernel in r363191. Is it possible > to try upgrading the kernel to that? >=20 Yes, I should be able to upgrade the system at some point this week. Thank you for taking a look. Glen --5mu1Tvth33Vj8K2q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjRJAPC5sqwhs9k2jAxRYpUeP4pMFAl8OBfEACgkQAxRYpUeP 4pPRpw//T6QzAhD6cvgKbUwWZaioQibjNqOO/0SG8cacDKPztDpBtPBAFBIUuxrJ t6yu3mzVl8+q0x+wsveZkZKIXiUKp7wbhfv0YPL8umgLXiUfWvMJY7y21fk9kHfr 930K1Eo1e84QcCs0CPeSawDVUfbX0NJBfGOAqIxuOo78JmWT17XZ501WbLNfwPuO Ibp2KKtEAsuBMFMGEYLzeLYk1pfggnuyYjy58q/yCV5CiFdKezFYvtpTRyK7PX/x G8P+n9ZCbA6bO/sYdTM93SiQakS7W5G0kw1vGGyY4cDP5/eKOyQcCiO9rULamUW3 01FTB67CvP1vgof9QIvIc5+IMOBr6sTPV/ZK6c9TlsHNM5PkPJ24Xou5m1Od2psQ f/cS2wLcTjRwQOaMMr5Q9JXh3TpH9QhYdOSGCVQq7M6kwZC8YvC2RZIbhhGCUQYJ sBMRoOhmf4ZVZV1SW+uuGGS6TqwbOwclUMohP4j1Z46eDSQS/kW+MeOYVbgBO45E HwLbdDSaTiKH95/Us4y/P5UfbN5ldQe9eV1xUlVrmM7/jCnUENl8RO5Vx8yWAt4K BgaZhQ86y8rlS7RE9EEVuEQBBAcME8/BzdUL/iVgaSCGx2P+7m2MF43flWToKCid Pw30RjnL6al9SDC9PrwZGIcSBmiAZ2ob3lOmMEvLQ3ViMv2jaoE= =LRo9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mu1Tvth33Vj8K2q--