From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Aug 10 15:19:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510DDBB5084 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112AB15D1; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id pp5so16723710pac.3; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:19:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vZiFbdJZ+X0Y84jfcjhtaOuRfams3CmLLmIAaCqyemo=; b=Zhn3+HEqmxUYInoitfszfCmR+eRmBE+Bz6v+qaXgWpAJRDTZPG8tM/5tw54YRQ0TPy oTYgjLov2gwJ2T+AITze5fEU7ZklqkylwR4WoFp2XiO/LTPlZE3II3QjMaeUWJZn1bLv QTWUSmNJDWeCYa9xzqwj/W1nZ2HrlULVwXqsAoj/qK/Um79TOPFowWZqfOeg0OoEHQDM Db3wX0orhnNh4EppLU840/V5iVSyrEl2M+75GXRogTiSt84pz4klcPNpcZTJdnXelUQ/ ahTubFnW/uSiqPtCo2zF1aLjYK3Dpbc1rhrKwa8h1OJ9RbNlBIQyBv0ZYISeYr40br/R Jb6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vZiFbdJZ+X0Y84jfcjhtaOuRfams3CmLLmIAaCqyemo=; b=ih6FGEXeVGPhqpU6u24S1L3zX6Apys7kYZ3L1l5sBRF8Yd2An3S4nacJdZo3d/izzQ KWio8k3SHn8VDjURekOsYSkr0T1ZyIFXfH/VtFuc7RiQ3HvFaViNwqNBWei5q0/76GWh rhY1PjSxi/Xry4bTkzMxCYopAq9GhrpWZydDlrV26E9ayVdK9iyCWzQ4MPY1xwIWRKw9 sjW82t04Hkq4EjBbz/6DcMxYbi31hl7nzeqRxuU1wIh7p77l82W0/JlwBxEOx9z7JEkx pwN2/UHntjjzvwTEwRGYhfIBgH9ui7td6vPac1rUXAH08xJoUkIRifo0p0ZAPv4LiHEN XrJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutoagyzel52BD+sq9PYnVEzsccTw1QDhEqvq+0RVMQXJwgtvUnfJMw6o7Gr5yl4sw== X-Received: by 10.66.13.200 with SMTP id j8mr8030399pac.150.1470842394307; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:d15:a692:4d9d:d5ff? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0d15-a692-4d9d-d5ff.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:d15:a692:4d9d:d5ff]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e187sm64806611pfg.43.2016.08.10.08.19.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Bug 211491] System hangs after "Uptime" on reboot with iSCSI, zfs, and altroot References: <933b8572-ce1d-623d-a0ac-fd99b0002d68@FreeBSD.org> To: Eric van Gyzen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <09274063-7ef5-24b9-e70f-e63c533a53d0@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 01:19:50 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <933b8572-ce1d-623d-a0ac-fd99b0002d68@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:19:55 -0000 On 11/08/2016 1:14 AM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 08/09/16 06:10 PM, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491 >> >> --- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper --- >> Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list >> unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit >> niche right now) > > I'm sorry that some people were annoyed, although I wouldn't call it > spam. It's a discussion of a bug that affects -STABLE, so stable@ is > appropriate. > > Furthermore, it's a new regression that will go into 11.0-RELEASE, so > getting some attention is a good thing. I imagine this is why koobs@ > CC'd stable@. It was the original reporter CC'd, I added mfc-stable{10,11} flags in case the issue was in those branches. I'm very careful with cc'ing lists for src/base issues unless SNR is very high, high impact or it needs eyes now. > I thought it was limited to iSCSI, so I put that in the summary. > However, we now know that it is not limited to iSCSI. I just updated > the summary accordingly. > > Cheers, > > Eric