From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 22 21:44:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA02720 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 21:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu (Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA02715 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 21:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA02844; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 23:42:59 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu: jfieber owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 23:42:59 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber X-Sender: jfieber@Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu To: Nik Clayton cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fvwm95 port and process limits In-Reply-To: <199604221325.OAA21603@plum.blueberry.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 22 Apr 1996, Nik Clayton wrote: > to know if (a) anyone using fvwm95 with FreeBSD has noticed this (b) what's > a 'good' figure for maxusers (the handbook says '4' should be enough for > anyone, but that doesn't gel with my experience) and (c) are there any 4? Why of course! Next you will start making absurd claims that people will need more than 640K of ram! Sheesh! ;-) Seriously, I have: maxusers 15 options "CHILD_MAX=128" which seems to work just dandy, though I have not tried fvwm95. I used to use fvwm, but have been running mwm for a month or so now. -john == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== == http://fallout.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ================