From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 13 22:30:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A676E16A420 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A7813C468 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) Received: from [63.251.67.21] (rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com [63.251.67.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8DMU2Jb041791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:30:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) From: Robert Noland To: Adam K Kirchhoff In-Reply-To: <1189720835.7484.1.camel@sorrow> References: <1189718884.1358.55.camel@localhost> <1189720835.7484.1.camel@sorrow> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ" Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:29:57 -0400 Message-Id: <1189722597.13714.15.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new emerald in ports (0.5.2) + beryl = problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:30:09 -0000 --=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 18:00 -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:28 -0400, Yousif Hassan wrote: > > Hey all: > >=20 > > I took the "chance" of upgrading emerald to 0.5.2 - I'm pretty sure thi= s > > new port revision is in there to eventually support compiz-fusion, whic= h > > is also at 0.5.2 since emerald is now part of that. However, there's > > still a dependency on emerald from the beryl port - and the beryl port > > hasn't moved! > >=20 > > To wit, if you're using Beryl, as I am, there seems to be a problem. > > The new 0.5.2 Emerald decorator doesn't work. I know what the problem > > is, but I can't seem to solve it: > >=20 > > beryl: decoration: property ignored because version is 20070319 and > > decoration plugin version is 20061011 > >=20 > > 20070319 certainly makes sense since this is a new version of emerald, > > but even after updating x11-themes/emerald-themes, I can't get the > > decorations to load. > >=20 > > Is there another module that should be made a dependency that I need to > > update/install? Or is the problem beryl (in which case, it may or may > > not get fixed there...?) > >=20 > > I'm sure this will be sorted out eventually, I just wanted to get the > > ball rolling in case this problem has not been discovered yet. >=20 > Unfortunately there is no fix. The version of emerald for c-f will not > work with beryl. Emerald should be removed as a dependency of the beryl > port, and users will just have to stick with aquamarine and heliodor > (assuming they're even available... I'm not in FreeBSD at the moment to > confirm this). =20 heliodor is in ports, aquamarine is not. emerald is only a dependency of the metaport. robert. > Adam >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBG6bnlM4TrQ4qfROMRAjb+AJ9jsZg7pFxfF7qJxAygxt6N5Mq/BACfal0/ GTfuXoecEg4Hd7njSlZqRsw= =zyXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dnZULv/c8R8YCH0QdCVJ--