From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb  9 09:54:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA26176
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA26171
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA23449; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:52:46 -0700
Message-Id: <199602091752.KAA23449@rover.village.org>
To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A.
    Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su>
Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? 
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 09 Feb 1996 19:12:27 +0300
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1996 10:52:46 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: Hows about running E-bones there?
: It allows rcp/rlogin/telnet without security risk.
: I know about SSH, but Kerberos looks as more standard way to do it.

And more stable :-)

We're running the Cygnus Kerberos, so I can't comment on ebones.
Looks like the same stuff...

Warner