From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Sep  2 20:41:28 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from laxmls02.socal.rr.com (laxmls02.socal.rr.com [24.30.163.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBC237B423
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Sep 2000 20:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jeremy.cerebralmaelstrom.com (sc-24-160-53-139.socal.rr.com [24.160.53.139])
	by laxmls02.socal.rr.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e833ebS03137;
	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200009030340.e833ebS03137@laxmls02.socal.rr.com>
subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all?
x-mailer: pmail 0.5.3
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
mime-version: 1.0
date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 20:41:39 PDT
From: Stephen Hansen <stephen@cerebralmaelstrom.com>
To: Stephen Hansen <stephen@cerebralmaelstrom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


"Stephen Hansen" wrote:
>  Okay, I'm not really involved in this conversation but I had to but
in a
>  bit, because
>  this argument is just absurd.
>  

Mmm. Okay, that looks nice.

Note to self: Don't press enter anymore.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message