From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 6 14:12:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from intergate.luciamar.k12.ca.us (intergate.luciamar.k12.ca.us [209.129.95.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD0E151CE for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dknapp@luciamar.k12.ca.us) Received: from luciamar.k12.ca.us (intergate.luciamar.k12.ca.us [209.129.95.252]) by intergate.luciamar.k12.ca.us (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA11560 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 14:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <370A78B9.28E19718@luciamar.k12.ca.us> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 14:12:25 -0700 From: David Knapp Organization: LMUSD X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: FreeBSD 3.1 Release or 3.1 Stable - have they converged? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have 3.1-RELEASE installed on my computer, but during the installation, I thought I read that 3.1-Release and 3.1-Stable had converged. I can't ftp in to verify the message, cuz cdrom.com is too busy. I also thought I remembered a question from someone who said that when they tried to install 3.1-Release that they were redirected to 3.1-Stable. Any clarification would be greatly appreciated. tia dbk -- David Knapp 805 473-4353 PC Network Specialist dknapp@luciamar.k12.ca.us LMUSD FreeBSD Newbie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message