From owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 22 19:56:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2FA16A4CE for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:56:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nuumen.pair.com (nuumen.pair.com [209.68.1.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 558A643D2F for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:56:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thuppi@nuumen.pair.com) Received: (qmail 69667 invoked by uid 55300); 22 Jan 2005 19:56:37 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:56:37 -0500 (EST) From: Tom Huppi X-X-Sender: thuppi@nuumen.pair.com To: "W. D." In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20050122124107.02abe830@209.152.117.178> Message-ID: References: <41F221E9.3090101@gmx.at> <5.1.0.14.2.20050122124107.02abe830@209.152.117.178> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Discovered a new browser... X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gathering place for new users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:56:37 -0000 On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, W. D. wrote: > At 04:15 1/22/2005, Tom Huppi wrote: > >It's only been recently that I've taken an interest in seeking out > >lightweight software. > > Any other tips? Which window manager/GUI do you recommend? Unfortunately, no. I've only recently taken to researching this problem and have no first-hand experience with any of the tools I've run across. I've always used 'fvwm2' since that's what I set up on my first FreeBSD box circa '98 and it's served my needs in this area fine. My needs are, however, limited. I'm more comfortable starting the applications I need from an xterm, and indeed, I spend quite a lot of time in an xterm doing one thing or another. I suspect that 'fvwm2' fits into the 'lightweight' category, but it's by happenstance. It seems that many of the Linux distributions which aim to conquer the problem of running well on dated hardware choose IceWM (iirc.) Anyone else have any tips or thoughts? I notice 'firefox' is happy to gobble down 50M and often significantly more with Xorg similar on my 5.3 system. It is very fortunate that FreeBSD's VM subsystem is intelligent enough to adapt else I am certain I would be having a lot more swapping on the box I'm currently using. I'm wondering if either of these applications themselves are 'smart' enough to adapt a bit to limited resources, or if there are any ways to build them specially to be a bit lighter. Thanks, - Tom