Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 13:37:03 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@cs.weber.edu, davidg@Root.COM, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSDk Message-ID: <199502282137.NAA00953@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199502282116.OAA10502@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 28, 95 02:16:23 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Should I keep going? The reason FreeBSD and NetBSD both exist is > because neither groups agrees wholly with the goals and directions of > the other groups. This means that there will be two differing versions, > whether you like it or not. Minimizing that is a worthy goal, but if it > means hobbling one group then it's not worth it. Can we bury this axe now ? Nobody seems to both want this enough and have sufficient time to do it, so it's dead, D.E.A.D ! now back to hacking... -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> TRW Financial Systems, Inc. I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502282137.NAA00953>