From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 19 07:57:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA12913 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA12905 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:57:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA03358; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810191458.HAA03358@implode.root.com> To: "John W. DeBoskey" cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conflicting ping performance In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:38:18 EDT." <199810191438.KAA23348@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 07:58:11 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Are you telling me it 'should' work this way now? Or that this >behaviour is a bug and was introduced in 1.40? It would appear >that the -i option is adversely affecting the -f option, and, yes, >I am running this test as root so -c should allow infinity. > > If it's a bug, I'll look into a submitting a diff... No, it shouldn't work that way. I've done some more checking and I think now that those changes aren't the cause. It appears that the system is returning ENOBUFS more easily than it used to. Needs more investigation. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message