From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 14:28:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCE237B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82F643FBD for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:28:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with ESMTP id <2003042121283700200pkc61e>; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:28:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA86346; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:28:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Terry Lambert In-Reply-To: <3EA4382F.6CA7C63A@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Daniel Eischen cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkse -> libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:28:39 -0000 On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Since libkse seems to be generally useful, anyone mind if I > > > go back to installing it as libpthread? > > > > There is some question over whether kse or thr will be the default > > threading implementation for 5.1. I think this should be discussed before > > we decide on what lib uses libpthread. > > Isn't libthr really just libkse with N = M? yes and no.. it could have been but for practical reasons was implemented separatly. > > These should behave exactly the same, right? It should even be > possible to drop the UTS out of the picture for everything but > signal handling, I think (i.e. it would never get upcalled) in > the 1:1 case, if this were done? > > -- Terry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >