From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 10:21:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9226A1065674 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F8C8FC1A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p1BALmnE098355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:21:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p1BALmcc098354; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA21212; Fri, 11 Feb 11 02:06:51 PST Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:05:10 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Message-Id: <4d5509d6.Um+QX3vryKLZS5fB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4D4F4544.3010606@csub.edu> <20110207045802.GB15568@icarus.home.lan> <4D4F8E34.7030904@FreeBSD.org> <4D4F927C.7040103@csub.edu> <20110210224703.GB57818@lonrach.keltia.net> In-Reply-To: <20110210224703.GB57818@lonrach.keltia.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:21:49 -0000 Ollivier Robert wrote: > Or switch to unbound. ^^^^^^^ Cute name, but perhaps a tiny bit misleading as to the product's origin -- the first thing I thought of on seeing a name like that was the FSF. Not this time: although its development was commercially sponsored it is BSD-licensed open source. And no, I have nothing at all to do with either the product or its developers/sponsors -- this is from the press release (where I had expected to find mention of GPL).