Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:48:06 +0900
From:      Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/acroread Makefile pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <20050911134806.65920cba.nork@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <op.sww6vbcy9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References:  <200509110358.j8B3wkob098825@repoman.freebsd.org> <op.sww6vbcy9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:03:01 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote:
> >   Add a symlink of nppdf.so into X11BASE/lib/browser_plugins.
> >   Bump PORTREVISION.
> I personal don't think it's good idea. browser-plugins is the place where  
> all native go in, not Linux binary. Linux binary can cause some troubles  

	Really?  Is there a policy that browser-plugins is the place
	where all native go in?

	So I think that linuxpluginwrapper should not be installed
	symlinks to Linux binaries.  To support Linux binaries with
	linuxpluginwrapper, browsers should be used
	X11BASE/lib/browser_linux_plugins?

> for the other browsers and apps.

	How troubles?  Apps cannot dynamic-link to Linux binaries
	without linuxpluginwrapper.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050911134806.65920cba.nork>