From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 20:49:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10F81065672 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E078FC12 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB8KnIlL097203; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:49:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mB8KnHSN042710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:49:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200812082049.mB8KnHSN042710@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:49:15 -0500 To: Marcel Moolenaar From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: <200812081621.mB8GLMxB041498@lava.sentex.ca> <200812081906.mB8J6oha042222@lava.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uart vs sio differences ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:49:20 -0000 At 02:18 PM 12/8/2008, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >I see, so the FreeBSD box with uart(4) is missing data, >not the Windows machine, right? Hi, Correct. The FreeBSD box never gets the full data, nor do we see it on the "protocol analyzer". Our analyzer is just a special serial cable that copies the data from both sides to the monitor program (a dos app) on another machine. >Do you know if you get the first 30 bytes or the last 30 >bytes or some mix? Just checked, and we get the first 31 bytes each time. Is it possible the larger fifo buffer of the 16950 is holding onto the data too long ? The sio sees it as a plain old 16550, but the uart driver sees it as the 16950 that it is. ---Mike