From owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  7 08:00:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9B016A4CE
	for <database@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 Jan 2005 08:00:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
	[213.184.65.80])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCED843D5C
	for <database@freebsd.org>; Fri,  7 Jan 2005 07:59:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])j077xtFs027433;
	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:59:56 +0700 (KRAT)
	(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Message-ID: <41DE405A.80E6D8DA@kuzbass.ru>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:55:06 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Organization: SVZServ
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <gwk@rahn-koltermann.de>
References: <41CAC3B4.F3378A56@kuzbass.ru>
	<1104856145.994.1.camel@localhost.muc.eu.mscsoftware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: database@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Oracle 10 anyone?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-database@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Database use and development under FreeBSD
	<freebsd-database.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-database>,
	<mailto:freebsd-database-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-database>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-database@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-database-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-database>,
	<mailto:freebsd-database-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:00:00 -0000

> > > Ktrace tells me that one of the last things that oracle does before
> > > exit(1), is trying to open /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax.  That is apparently
> > > not implemented by linprocfs.
> > >
> > > Did anyone get farther than this?
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've just upgraded working Oracle9i (9.2.0.1.0) upto 9.2.0.6.0
> > It does nearly the same thing. Did you manage to solve the problem
> > that time?
> 
> Unfortunately that's still on my list :(  hopefully this year...

They say, 9.2.0.4.0 works. JFYI.
I'll try it.

Eugene