Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:21:20 -0400 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, > but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they > are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html > > Graphs are available as PDF attachments > > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf > > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA>