From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 28 12:55:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.microbsd.net (ns1.microbsd.net [4.23.122.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2547C37B416; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.microbsd.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.microbsd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 678441F08; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:49:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from vaio.microbsd.net (unknown [65.162.182.48]) by mail.microbsd.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30711F05; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:49:16 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: pf OR ipf ? From: kerberus To: "Crist J. Clark" Cc: Attila Nagy , Alex Holst , security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020328121200.C97841@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <20020328064640.GA74780@area51.dk> <20020328121200.C97841@blossom.cjclark.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2-5mdk Date: 28 Mar 2002 15:54:37 -0500 Message-Id: <1017348877.4218.49.camel@vaio.microbsd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ill take em Ive been waiting for ipfilter bridgeing code for FreeBSD for ages!! > There is nothing special about PF that makes bridge support > easier. Afterall, there is mature bridging support for IPFilter in > OpenBSD. I also recently committed a hack for IPFilter bridging > support in -CURRENT. I'll put the -STABLE patches on the website > listed in the headers and .sig today if anyone wants 'em. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message